Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Peter Henry's avatar

Spot-on observations about both the differences between the SF/Silicon Valley ecosystem and ethos, and those of the London/UK/EU. Each brings something important, materially and philosophically, to the game, and ultimately the "truth" of what should work optimally is somewhere in the middle - a mix of both. I made the same move (SF to UK/London) several months ago after spending my university time and most of my career in the Silicon Valley and SF business arenas. (Although I have made a slight shift from the VC world into combination of advisory and investing.)

One thing you didn't mention that is worthy of note is the difference in attitudes to risk between the two sides of the pond (both taking risk as well as recognizing and managing/mitigating it). What sometimes seems like risk aversion over here is sometimes more a case of wanting to understand the risks and address them, in order to improve the odds of success. UK/EU business cultures have historically not looked fondly upon failed businesses, whereas the Silicon Valley startup view is that failure is a badge of honor and experience. Contrast that with the SV "move fast and break things, damn the torpedoes" approach.

Failure is certainly educational (often more so than success), but success is till the goal, which is why I believe recognizing and seizing opportunity (like most VCs aim to do) while also identifying and mitigating risk (like main-line private equity managers do) is the happy medium that can result when the thinking from both sides of the pond are brought together.

No posts

Ready for more?